Monday, August 27, 2012

The Fab Four Series: Part2





Part1: The ‘Change the trend’ tour down under
Part2: The World Cup debacle
Part3: The Controversial Oz tour.
Part4: The Sunset, losing streak and what lies ahead.



Note: A slight change in Part-2: Only World Cup debacle will be covered as it turned out be a lengthy narrative in itself.



Part2: The World Cup Debacle


I left the last part of this series, here, (click to see the last part) calling the Australian Tour the start of downfall of Saurav Ganguly’s batting form. With the wins on Australian soil, against Pakistan in 2004 and a successful 2003 World Cup on his CV, Ganguly was deemed the best captain India ever had by cricket pundits. But the runs from the southpaw’s willow dried completely in 2004 and thereupon every single loss highlighted his dismal batting run even more. Don’t dismiss it as small event; it was much more than just a drop in a single player’s confidence; it was the drop in the confidence of a team whose captain had become diffident. As always, when things go wrong ‘CHANGE’ is the buzzword.




Image source: Oulook
In September 2005, Greg Chappell took over the coaching reigns and pressed for the urgent need of blooding youngsters in team with 2007 World Cup in sight. The scapegoats were the non-performing old legs. Chappell had emailed the Board of Control for Cricket in India, stating that Ganguly was "physically and mentally" unfit to lead India. This email was leaked to the media and resulted in huge recoil from Ganguly's fans. And within a month, groggy, unathletic, out-of-form Saurav Ganguly was dropped and out-of-favour. A spate of controversies ensued, with coach making the news for all the wrong reasons.

One Fab4 member’s decline meant passing on of the baton, Rahul Dravid took over the leadership crown and as always, committed himself to a new role for the team.  In an era of mixed wins and losses and enshrouding controversies, Dravid helped the team to some memorable wins in West Indies. Under Dravid-Chappell, the ‘report card’ was an impressive read. India jumped from the 7th ICC spot in ODIs to 3rd in quick time. The ODI squad saw Raina and Dhoni emerging as responsible young batters who could chase down targets easily. Yuvraj Singh’s career grew in stature. Notably, chasing targets was a rarity in Ganguly’s golden era. But as the World Cup drew near, doubts started to creep in. The young team had a disastrous Champions Trophy in 2006. It resulted in comeback call of Saurav Ganguly to the frail ODI side. He justified selection ( like he said in an Ad) with some good knocks that. though lacked the old touch,  but still went down as ‘runs’ on scoreboard. Some anchoring fifties against Sri Lanka and West Indies in Feb 2007 secured Ganguly a spot in the World Cup. Ganguly’s success and youngsters’ simultaneous dip had messed up the Chappell vision. The team that went to Caribbean was finally a veteran team that featured Sachin, Ganguly, Dravid and Kumble. All the legends of last decade. But no Laxman.

In an illustrious career that had seen some classy knocks, Laxman failed to make it to another World Cup. His own ODI form had dropped after a spate of ODI centuries in 2004 that looked like a second life to his ODI career. But more than the decline, it was inconsistency and ‘one-paced game’ as per Chappell that kept him out-of-favour. The focus on fielding in that period always singled out Laxman .All this was despite his superb form in Australia and Pakistan in early 2004, when he made four centuries in 14 games, including three in a week in the VB Series in Australia. His good close-catching skills weren’t enough and a spate of centuries sandwiched between some inconsistent series, kept him out of ODI side mostly. He showcased timely brilliance to silence critics, like in West Indies. But, that was not enough for the five wise men and Chappell. As a final nail in the coffin, his dream of featuring in a World Cup seemed over when the World Cup team couldn’t afford him, with the age too nearing 33.

Sachin Tendulkar meanwhile was a shadow of its former self. His form was fickle, and his knocks had ‘accumulated singles’ written all over them. The injuries had cut down his shots especially the hook shot he churned out in 90s. Critics had written him off. Ricky Ponting and Jacques Kallis were at the peak of their careers, and Sachin’s records seemed vulnerable at one point of time.The World Cup affair of the little master raised hopes from fans, who wished to see him back among runs. And more than runs, back with that midas touch of old.

The World Cup was a dream that had eluded India for 20 years. A dream India’s Fabulous Four had not realized. India had fallen one short in 2003. It seemed a last shot at glory. Time was running out. Kumble was on the brink of retirement. All the hype of Chappell always had the keyword of World Cup mentioned in it. Time had come now. They were one of the favourites on slow Caribbean pitches with an experienced squad that looked formidable on paper. But they had to deliver on field, which unfortunately they didn’t.



In the opening match at port-of-Spain, Bangladesh turned out to be the David who killed the Goliath. All of a sudden, the same formidable eleven looked brittle, the bowling  attack became toothless, the batting crumbled. India didn’t lose the match; it lost the belief of winning the World Cup. The formalities of exit were completed in the first round itself. 2007 World Cup was perhaps the most controversial and dragging World Cup, with stretched schedule, early exit of Asian giants India and Pakistan, the sudden death of Bob Woolmer and the last three overs of the final being played in darkness, inter alia. Add to that some retirements, like every edition of this marquee event has. And finally an expected Australian hat-trick of World Cups to wind off a World Cup, which most Indians had stopped watching after Indian exit.. The sole consolation for India was a one-sided game against Bermuda where Sehwag and Yuvraj showed signs of form. Tendulkar failed for the first time in a World Cup, the event where his run-making was almost customary till now. He looked out of sorts and out of runs, so did the team.

Image source: SantaBanta
The image of teary-eyed Dravid in the final moments of Sri Lanka loss had said it all. Dravid, a thinking captain, had done so much in the past two years of rebuilding with Chappell. All those series wins, all those home ground chases, all those strategies, all those controversies, all that hard work had evaporated with the bottom line of India’s early exit. Unexpected debacle would be perhaps the only thing linked, when Dravid would be talked of as Indian Captain. It was clear that effigies will be burnt in protest. Some heads will roll. Some scapegoats will be singled out. Some inciting stories will be published in media. One thing was more certain:

Inside that teary eye of Dravid, a dream of a nation had shattered.


The debacle meant a leeway for critics. The voices that were murmuring till now about Sachin’s retirement found strength. Rahul Dravid’s captaincy career seemed over. Saurav Ganguly did no good by scoring a selfish-looking fifty against Bangladesh. Indian cricket perhaps needed a renewal. A long-term vision was called to be lacking. Fresh legs were in demand again. The names of Yuvraj Singh cropped up for captaincy in some circles. All of a sudden, the fabulous four looked toothless in impact.

Like a kid who does everything right in practice but still gets nervous on the stage, India veterans had not come good at the biggest stage-THE WORLD CUP. In a cricketing nation with short term memory, their past performances didn’t matter to the public anymore. The crevices had turned into gaping holes. They were being seen as heroes merely on paper; sheer nominal legends. Indian Cricket had found itself caught between the idea of youth and experience. The balance had perhaps gone awry. The strategies had gone awry perhaps. And perhaps, the career of the four Indian legends had too gone awry. But like all stories of superheroes, this end looked inapt and uncalled for.  Heroes are always meant to end with a win, I learned in childhood. This could not have been the end….




 In case you have missed the first part:
 Part-1 of Fab4 series
 


Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Cricket is not popular, Sir.

TEST PLAYING NATIONS: 10
OLYMPICS NATIONS: 204

Why Cricket is not in Olympics?” As top athletes fight out for medals in London, this question must have crossed most of cricket fans’ mind. Well, the two criteria that a sport has to satisfy to be in Olympics are universality and popularity among other factors. It is an interesting choice of words, mind you. Some will argue that cricket is a more popular sport than sports like canoe slalom, fencing and other lesser heard names which made it to Olympics. Yes, you are right. Statistically, cricket is the second most popular sport of the world as per an article in The New York Times, insubstantially though. Interestingly, the yardstick that defines the popularity of cricket can be the number of fans who follow it or the number of nations where it is popular. I would say cricket is popular in nations which share a huge percentage of population of the world like India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. But if you consider the global awareness of cricket, let alone popularity, it is gloomy.

And at this point of time, why can’t IOC build cricket stadiums for every country that hosts it? The reason they aren’t built is that nobody is interested in cricket there! If you think of host cities for Olympics: Atlanta, Barcelona, Athens, Beijing ..rarely there are cities in cricket-playing nations. I remember a one-off India Netherlands cricket match being telecasted on ESPNStar. The pre-match show had a survey of local Dutch people about cricket and surprisingly, cricket, the insect was more popular than cricket, the game there. And yes, Netherlands is close to the county-cricket nation England and has played in many ICC events! Unfortunately, Dutch scenario is just a case in point and no exception.

The Problem

If we look closely, besides the ten ICC full member nations, there are 36 Associate members and 60 Affiliate members out of which only six namely Afghanistan, Canada, Ireland, Kenya, Netherlands and Scotland play some ‘serious’ cricket. In other teams, you would find players who play cricket as a hobby on Sundays and work on the weekdays. The Bermuda team which played in World Cup 2007 is an example of this hobby-cricket. I wonder how many local Bermuda people even knew that Bermuda was representing itself in that ICC marquee event. Same goes for associate/affiliate teams who have had years of experience playing with each other and yet have not graduated to the top level. And how can they graduate if they don’t play against the better teams? Cricket thus remains a lesser-known sport in these associate/affiliate nations.


Another factor while discussing ‘popularity’ is the real popularity at grass root level. How many nations’ children play cricket on streets in their childhood? Very few. In fact, teams like USA and Canada don’t have Americans and Canadians playing in their teams but the Asians and County players who perhaps went there for a better career.
Associate nations need more examples like Netherland’s Ryan ten Doeschate in IPL, Big Bash, etc.
So, why are the other nations not playing cricket? The reasons are seemingly complex rules, lack of the required skill set and global academies to help budding cricketers evolve and compete with the best. Naturally, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) won’t include a sport where podium finishes are decided before the games begin!

Solutions

The ICC gloats of popularizing cricket with various associate tournaments that happen round-the-clock. But the gap between test-playing nations and these associate/affiliate nations isn’t narrowing.  Apparently, these nations are playing in a zone of their own. Beating each other won’t help. They need serious cricket with full-members. The ICC is worried that a Denmark vs. India match won’t buy sponsors and stadium tickets, and that is why these games aren’t promoted. Don’t look much far – just count the difference between the tests Bangladesh and India plays per year. This money-drawing calendar of matches isn’t helping the ‘popularity’ of cricket.
A possible solution would be to let these associate teams tour the full-member nations more frequently to know how it is like playing at the bigger level. Some of these players will get noticed, get IPL, Big Bash contracts and the money will start to pour in these nations for better administration and facilities. It is a long term investment which might draw less people to stadiums initially but later on, as these nations show some fighting spirit, only the game of cricket will benefit.
Another solution will be to promote the inter-associate competitions more. Even county cricket is shown on television, then why not national cricket matches of associate nations. ICC needs to take a leaf from FIFA’s book which has ‘popularized’ football in all possible definitions of the word.
Next time while watching cricket, do let your cousin in Brussels or Vienna know what cricket is! The word might just spread..

'On a good Length'  feels cricket needs expansion.

Saturday, August 18, 2012

Quotes about Laxman

I googled this term and was surprised to have found only two on Wikipedia page. In comparison, you would find avalanche of quotes easily on Sachin and Dravid. Anyways while I read several articles yesterday, I  found a handful of quotes sandwiched in between and most of them were amazing.


"If you get Dravid, great. If you get Sachin, brilliant. If you get Laxman, it's a miracle." Brett Lee repeats the words of wisdom of his former captain,Steve Waugh 

"I hope his back's pretty sore for next week as well and he can't play." Ricky Ponting pays a back-handed compliment to Australia's nemesis

Image source: rediff


At a nets session one remembers coach John Wright calling a young batsman and telling him, “Watch him, but don’t try to imitate. Only VVS can play them.” Yes, only Laxman could have played with such imperious dominance. Not at nets; in a challenging match situation.


Remembering  the one-wicket win over Australia at Mohali in 2010 when Laxman and Ishant Sharma added 81 runs for the ninth wicket. Ishant discovered his batting potential that afternoon. “Watching Laxman bhai bat, I thought this was easy. Watching him, I also thought how I wish I had been a batsman!”  


"When i walk out to play in Hyderabad I will feel a deep void. A void that can never be filled. My dear friend, VVS Laxman..."
India team-mate Sachin Tendulkar on Twitter after retirement announcement

"That was the brightest day in Laxman's career. That innings had a big impact on Indian cricket. It had given us a huge sense of relief and made us have belief in ourselves that we're not behind... Since then, we never looked back as Indian cricket kept improving."
Former India captain Sourav Ganguly on Laxman's 281 in the 2001 Kolkata Test against Australia

"VVS is one of the finest human beings to have played cricket. One of the main pillars of the team and a true friend. Words are not enough."
India team-mate Virender Sehwag

"His (Laxman) knock was absolutely fantastic and had a lot of character, guts and class. Definitely, it lifted me as such a knock puts a lot pressure on the bowlers. Laxman's knock was a big inspiration for me ," Rahul Dravid who returned to form and struck an unbeaten 155 on the fourth day of the second Test at Kolkata.

From carrying his innings to carrying himself, VVS has shown immense class. Will miss you Laxman bhai."
India team-mate Suresh Raina


"Not many batsmen made batting look as easy as VVS Laxman. If a cricketer's greatness is to be measured in terms of his performances against the best opposition of his time, then Laxman stands right at the top; his record against Australia, the world's No. 1 team for the better part of his career, speaks for itself. Indian cricket-lovers, and the game of cricket itself, will miss him for the elegance and grace that he epitomised, on and off the field."
BCCI president N Srinivasan

A wizard among muggles
-Sharda Ugra, Cricinfo

I feel sadder at VVS's departure than Dravid's. With Dravid, I respected *what* he did. With Laxman, I loved *how* he did it. Magic.
-Ramesh Srivats, Twitter

My favourite ones by Harsha Bhogle and Zaheer Khan,
"Requires a very special man to turn his back on a grandstand end and accept the moment has come. Rose in my eyes if he could any more."
Cricket commentator Harsha Bhogle aftr Laxman announced to retire an inch before his home test where he could have got farewell from home audience.

“On his day he could beat even 22 fielders and find the boundary,” as Zaheer Khan  analyzes after a laxman innings





Friday, August 17, 2012

The Fab Four Series: Part1

My affair with test cricket has coincided with the Fab4 of Tendulkar, Laxman, Ganguly and Dravid being the linchpin of Indian batting. With only vestiges of that era remaining, I look back at some of the moments involving fab4 that probably altered the course of Indian cricket. And went on to define it. Their contribution was much more than the runs they made together, perhaps something not quantifiable.

 fab4 series
Part1: The ‘Change the trend’ tour down under
Part2: The World Cup debacle and Controversial Oz tour.
Part3:The Sunset, losing streak and what lies ahead.



I will start with part one because it comes to my mind like yesterday, having seen the tour ball by ball. Part-II will follow. And Part III will wind off the series.



Part1: The ‘Change the trend’ tour down under

Image source: Cricinfo
The clock was striking four on a typical lazy winter morning in India. The kind of day on which most alarms would have got snoozed if it was not for a test match going on, oceans across at Adelaide Oval.  The stage was set. The Indian captain had scored a fighting century to ensure draw in the first match at Brisbane, a result which was more than acceptable from the bad tourists. A statement had been made with that century. ‘We can fight’ was the message. The Indian intentions were of something bigger than draw this time around and consequently, Adelaide test was something the media and fans were desperately waiting for. The second test began as a one-sided contest, putting lid to all the hype that preceded it. The first four sessions all belonged to the home side, as Indian bowlers helped Australia to post a mammoth 556 on scoreboard. Ricky Ponting smashed a 242, hitting Indian medium-pacers all over the park. Indians had their backs against the walls. The Indian batting had to rescue from the situation their bowlers had put them in. At 30/31, an age called to be a prime time for a batsman-Tendulkar, Ganguly, Dravid and Laxman were probably playing in their last Australian-tour together. You had a feeling they would click, even if the pressure was mountainous. And they almost didn’t.


After a 66 run opening stand, Indian batting line-up crumbled to 85/4 within a few overs with all top four including Tendulkar and Ganguly back in pavilion. The Dravid-Laxman partnership was the last hope for the tourists in an illustrious line-up. The pair went on to recreate the Eden magic, only this time the protagonist and the deuteragonist exchanging roles. Dravid played the best innings of his life against a ‘Gillespie, MacGill and in-form Bichel ‘lead attack. A sublime 233, undoubtedly a magnum opus adorned with cuts, drives and pulls.The Wall batted 594 minutes on Day2 and 3, vindicating the sobriquet given to him. In an era where Dravid's rise met Sachin's fall, Rahul Dravid looked impermeable on the crease. There seemed no humanely way, at times,to procure his wicket. Laxman, the Picasso, meanwhile weaved wristy magic with some majestic pulls, scoring 148, an innings better than all but the 281. India went to achieve one of its greatest overseas victories ever thanks to Agarkar’s spell; with the montage of Dravid hitting the winning runs becoming one of the most memorable scenes of Indian cricket.  It wasn’t just a test win. It was a statement. A statement that Indian batting is not a nominal line-up gloating of statistics, but an aesthetic and impermeable line-up that can score runs on any surface against any line-up. Three members of fab4 had scored tons.

Image source: Cricinfo
The winning moment
‘The wounded tiger is dangerous’. Australia turned the tables in Melbourne test, outbatting the Indians again with Ponting going on to better his 242 with a 257. Sehwag scored a quick 195 but only Dravid could make an impact, as far as the fab four were concerned. Ganguly’s bat had gone quiet. Laxman failed in both innings. The pressure was back to India, and more precisely the spotlight was on Sachin Tendulkar, who was probably playing his last test in Australia, which though didn’t turn out to be his last, years later. The Sydney test was an emotional landmark for the Oz, as Steve Waugh had announced to retire. The focus was on Waugh and Tendulkar, the two great men. And as they say, ‘Cometh the moment, cometh the man’, both stole the limelight in their own ways with the former hitting a double century and the latter knitting a match-saving 80.  The Border-Gavaskar trophy was due for more grime-gathering, as it had remained intact in India after the series was drawn level. India had won the hearts. The fight from the tourists was not much expected. And when David gives Goliath a run for its money, it is the spirit of the fight that impresses the audience most.

The series was a landmark in Indian cricket. As a young cricket fan, I had this feeling that it was something that will define the subsequent years of Indian cricket. The fab four had all come good, at different times, when the team needed them. The series on one side marked the peak of Dravid and Laxman, then on other side a start of downfall of Ganguly’s own form. Tendulkar, one could see, had much more left ahead of him. One thing was sure after the tour, this was not the last tour down under of fab4. Indian cricket was a hypothetical level-up

In his blog years later, Aakash Chopra revealed the motto of the tour was ‘change the trend’, which they surely did…




Thursday, August 9, 2012

Best Probable Indian Squad for New Zealand Series

Image source: Times Of India


India begins its test campaign after a lay-off of 7 months. Unlike the last 8 tests it lost, the next few are on its own home soil. With the home advantage and few good selections, India can get its winning momentum back and pep up the rankings too! This post acts as a fellow-selector in analyzing the best possible Indian squad that can be picked in post-Dravid era!

Step 1: Decomposition of 14 men squad:
A two-test home series needs to have 14 members. 15 or 16 member squad will mean at least 4 players benched throughout the series.
Position
Comment
Openers -2                                     
        
Middle order Batsman-5                     
Wicketkeeper-1
Spinners-3
Pacers- 3

(Don’t need third specialist opener in subcontinent)
(Two extra batsmen for Dravid void )
(Settled)
(Turning tracks)



Step2: Zeroing in on final team

A)Openers
No two opinions here. Gautam Gambhir and Virender Sehwag are automatic selections. Sehwag,however, had a glute problem at the fag end of the series. In case of his unavailability, Rahane can sneak in.

B)Middle-Order Bat
Sachin Tendulkar, VVS Laxman and Virat Kohli are automatic selections for number 4,5,6 positions in team. The number three position left void by Rahul Dravid is up for the grabs. Rohit Sharma’s dismal show has decreased his chances. Suresh Raina might not have done enough to convince of a test comeback. Cheteshwar Pujara will make the cut  most probably. While the fifth batsman might be Manoj Tiwary, on accounts of form.. S badrinath has not been on radar for India-A team even.

C)Wicketkeeper bat
MS Dhoni is the obvious and lone choice.

D) Spinners

This is interesting as Harbhajan took 3/29 for Essex recently that might make him the second-choice spinner for the home series. Ashwin is a certain choice. Ojha might edge out Rahul Sharma, given the lack of experience of latter.

E)Pacers
Zaheer Khan is a regular choice. Umesh Yadav might take the second place. Praveen Kumar, if fit, can sneak in as third-choice pacer. Injuries galore in this section as Ishant, Sreesanth, Aaron and Nehra all unfit and some gradually out of selection radar.

Conclusion
India won’t look to experiment with new faces much having lost last eight matches. It would like to take a safe route of winning a series and getting some wins under the belt before the October series against Aussies.

Squad
Virender Sehwag/Rahane (subject to fitness)
Gautam Gambhir
Cheteshwar Pujara
Sachin Tendulkar
VVS Laxman
Virat Kohli
MS Dhoni ( c&Wk)
Harbhajhan Singh
R Ashwin
Zaheer Khan
Umesh Yadav

Manoj Tiwary
Praveen Kumar/Ashok Dinda (subject to fitness)
Pragyan Ojha






Friday, August 3, 2012

India in Games- A limerick

Indian public is dejected a lot and why not !
Our Olympians didn't win much in London, as they thought.
All hopes were on a certain shuttler Saina
But she couldn't beat her tough opponent from China.
The 'medals',  people are asking -why weren't brought?


Some will blame the domestic training,
Some will say foreign coaches we should bring.
Media will harp on with special evening shows
And highlight the great Indian lows
Ah! Let T20 games come, you won't remember a thing.
Sigh!


This sarcastically is true Indian story. I am of the opinion that many talented sportsmen and women of different sports go unnoticed in this country where a Ranji player gets more acclaim  than a CWG medal winner. Cricket helps the nation engaged in sports and often is a cloak which hides the lack of support for other games, In such cricket-obsessed country, let alone bringing olympic medal, even qualifying is a feat which is done in adverse circumstances.Hats off to those who dare to go in the less-sought sports and excel for India and yet bear the criticism when they fail to finish on podium. The fight they show , i believe, matters more.

 Hope things change for the better.

Receive All Free Updates Via Facebook.